All Posts

We live in a world that runs on messages. They flash across our screens, pulse through cables under oceans, ripple through our cells, and shape our relationships, economies, and decisions. But what do we really mean when we say information ? Nearly a century ago, Norbert Wiener - the mathematician who founded cybernetics - was asking a question that still defines our time: what is information, and what does it mean for life itself? For Wiener, information wasn’t simply a bypr

We usually imagine politics at a distance: parliaments, parties, polls. But there is another scene where power works more intimately, closer to the skin. Deleuze and Guattari call it micropolitics, and it asks a simple, disarming question: what if the decisive struggles of the present take place not only in constitutions and courts, but in tones of voice, seating plans, login screens, and phrases that pass between us almost unnoticed. Micropolitics does not replace the macro.

Traditionally, “style” has meant individuality. From classical rhetoric to modern aesthetics, we are taught to recognize an artist’s signature as a deviation from a norm: the brushstroke that resists the conventions of composition, the musical phrasing that bends harmony, the sculptural form that unsettles proportion, the cinematic cut that breaks narrative flow. Style, in this sense, is what makes a work distinct - its surplus, its residue of personality or genius that remai

This short essay revisits Kant’s “What Is Enlightenment?”  and Foucault’s response to it - a glimpse into our upcoming Foucault course . In 1784, Immanuel Kant was asked a deceptively simple question: What is Enlightenment?  His answer, compressed into a few pages, became one of the founding texts of modern thought. But rather than describing a historical event or a period in European history, Kant proposed something far more radical: Enlightenment, he wrote, is man’s exit fr